Which statement about training requirements is true in the context of ARMS?

In the context of Aviation Resource Management Systems (ARMS), the statement that all training must be documented in ARMS is essential for maintaining a comprehensive record of training compliance and readiness. Proper documentation ensures accountability and supports the tracking of qualifications and certifications required for aircrew members, which is crucial for mission effectiveness and safety. Accurate records also facilitate audits and assessments of personnel skills, ensuring that all members meet the required training standards set by regulatory bodies and command directives. This systematic approach helps in identifying training gaps and ensuring that personnel are current and qualified for their roles.

Regarding the other statements, training requirements are not optional or irrelevant, as they impact operational readiness and safety standards. Moreover, training frequency varies based on specific requirements and roles, and it’s not solely fixed at two years. Each of these aspects highlights the importance of documenting training to ensure compliance and readiness in aviation resource management.